Who must be notified within 48 hours of a room bug activation for a nonconsensual intercept?

The requirement to notify a Superior Court judge within 48 hours of a room bug activation for a nonconsensual intercept is rooted in legal protocols designed to ensure oversight and accountability in surveillance operations. This notification is crucial because it serves to uphold the integrity of the legal process, providing the judiciary with the opportunity to review the circumstances under which the surveillance was enacted.

By alerting a judge, the law aims to prevent abuse of power and protect individuals' rights to privacy. The involvement of the court ensures that appropriate legal standards are met and that there is judicial oversight over the potentially invasive action of nonconsensual surveillance. This requirement is fundamental in maintaining a balance between law enforcement needs and the protection of civil liberties, while promoting transparency in the conduct of intercept operations.

Other individuals or roles mentioned may have important responsibilities in the context of a surveillance operation, but they do not fulfill the legal obligation that the law imposes on notifying the judiciary, which is a critical component of ensuring the legitimacy of the intercept.